Nature Series Article 03 of 5 Land Emissions Targets

SBTi FLAG for Nature

Forest, Land & Agriculture targets — the part of the Science Based Targets initiative that finally connects land emissions to the corporate nature story.

By Juan Manuel & Vaibhav Jain · April 2026 · 11 min read
SBTi FLAG NO-DEFORESTATION Cut-off 1 Jan 2020 (recommended) Target 31 Dec 2025 FOREST · LAND · AGRICULTURE
Threshold
>20%
Land emissions trigger for mandatory FLAG target
Coverage
95% / 67%
Scope 1+2 / Scope 3 FLAG emissions
No-Deforestation Target
31 Dec 2025
Cut-off 1 Jan 2020 (recommended) · AFi-aligned
The Guidance

What is the SBTi FLAG guidance?

The SBTi Forest, Land and Agriculture (FLAG) guidance is the part of the Science Based Targets initiative that finally puts numbers on land-sector emissions. Published in 2022 and substantially revised in 2025, it requires companies with material exposure to forest, land, or agricultural value chains to set a separate, science-aligned target for those emissions — on top of their existing energy-and-industry SBTs.

FLAG covers land use change emissions (deforestation, peatland conversion), land management emissions (fertiliser, livestock methane, soil practices), and biogenic CO₂ removals (afforestation, restoration, soil carbon). Together, AFOLU is roughly 22% of global GHG emissions and was historically excluded from corporate climate targets — FLAG closes that gap.

Why FLAG matters for nature. Land is where climate and nature collide. A FLAG target operationalises the “reduce” side of the corporate nature story — it’s the most concrete reduction pathway most companies have for their nature footprint.

Applicability

Who must set a FLAG target.

A company is required to set a FLAG target if either condition is true:

A consumer goods company sourcing palm oil, soy, cocoa, beef or paper in volume will almost always trip the threshold. So will retailers and QSR chains with private-label food. So will mining and infrastructure projects with land-clearing exposure.

Coverage & Pathways

Two pathway choices, one tight scope.

FLAG targets must cover 95% of Scope 1 and Scope 2 FLAG emissions and 67% of Scope 3 FLAG emissions by the target year. Companies pick between two pathway approaches.

Pathway A
Sector pathway

A FLAG-wide reduction trajectory of ~3.03% per year absolute reduction. Simpler to apply, but ignores commodity-specific context. Suitable for diversified retailers and processors with mixed FLAG exposure.

Pathway B
Commodity-specific pathways

11 commodities — beef, chicken, dairy, leather, maize, palm oil, pork, rice, rubber, soy, wheat — each with its own baseline and reduction rate tailored to the commodity’s emission profile.

FLAG V1.2 is tightly aligned with the GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard (January 2026) for land-use-change accounting. The Standard defines three LUC categories — direct LUC (dLUC), statistical LUC (sLUC) and indirect LUC (iLUC) — and applies a 20-year linear discounting convention so emissions from historical land conversion amortise across two decades.

No-deforestation commitment

In addition to the reduction pathway, FLAG-eligible companies must put a no-deforestation policy in place by 31 December 2025. The recommended cut-off date is 1 January 2020; FLAG V1.2 allows flexibility on the cut-off, but it must be no more than 3 years before the submission of the target. The commitment is aligned with the Accountability Framework initiative (AFi), so existing AFi commitments map across.

The no-deforestation scope is tighter than the FLAG pathway scope. It covers seven key commodities — cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soy, and timber — and applies where any of these represent 1% or more of total FLAG volume. Other deforestation-risk commodities are in scope at a 5% threshold. A FLAG target without a valid no-deforestation commitment is rejected at SBTi review.

Offsets, Removals & Responsibility

No offsets in the target. BVCM and removals are separate.

Offsets cannot count towards FLAG target progress. Companies must reduce gross FLAG emissions on the pathway. Three nuances matter for the corporate strategy team:

REMOVALS COUNT

In-value-chain biogenic removals (afforestation, soil carbon, agroforestry on owned or sourced land) do count — but must meet stringent permanence and additionality criteria.

BVCM IN PARALLEL

Beyond Value Chain Mitigation (high-quality offsets) is encouraged for ongoing emissions but tracked separately, never as target progress.

RESIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY

SBTi’s Net Zero Standard expects ongoing-emission compensation for the residual share — routed through CCP-eligible removals and high-integrity nature credits.

FLAG & TNFD

FLAG and TNFD are complementary, not duplicative. FLAG operationalises the “reduce” side — quantified, time-bound emission targets for the land-using parts of the business. TNFD operationalises the “disclose” side — the dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities a company surfaces while doing the FLAG work.

Practically: the LEAP “Locate” and “Evaluate” outputs feed FLAG’s commodity-specific footprint. The FLAG target then becomes a key metric inside TNFD’s Metrics & Targets pillar. Companies that run them in sequence pay roughly half the data-collection cost of running each in isolation.

Sequencing tip. Run TNFD “Locate” first. The priority-location list it produces is the right starting point for FLAG’s footprint inventory — not a generic supply-chain map.

How Climate Decode Helps

FLAG plus nature reporting in one engagement.

Climate Decode runs FLAG-eligible companies through a single integrated engagement covering the FLAG target submission and the TNFD disclosure that surrounds it.

01
FLAG Eligibility & Footprint

Threshold check, commodity-by-commodity inventory using the GHG Protocol Land Sector Standard, baseline year selection, and pathway choice (sector vs commodity-specific).

02
Target Setting & Submission

Reduction-trajectory modelling, no-deforestation commitment drafting, target letter and SBTi submission package, and SBTi review-cycle handling.

03
Disclosure Integration

FLAG target landed inside TNFD Metrics & Targets, ESRS E4 climate-and-nature mapping, BRSR alignment where applicable, and CDP forests/water response.

Continue the Nature Series

Five practitioner guides covering the corporate nature-reporting stack end-to-end.

Article 01
TNFD for Corporates
14 recommendations, four pillars, and the practitioner playbook.
Article 02
The LEAP Approach
Locate, Evaluate, Assess, Prepare — the four-step methodology behind a TNFD disclosure.
Article 04
IFC Performance Standards
PS6, the mitigation hierarchy, and the biodiversity backbone of project finance.
Article 05
The EU Nature Stack
CSRD ESRS E4, EUDR, the Nature Restoration Law and how they align with TNFD.

The Experts Behind This Series

Climate Decode in-house, working alongside Fundación HAMBOS — our strategic partner for Nature, Land & Forestry. Practitioner track record across corporate nature reporting, carbon markets and forestry project development on three continents.

Vaibhav Jain

Vaibhav Jain

Founding Managing Director, Climate Decode

12+ years across nature-based solutions, carbon markets and climate finance — four continents of practitioner experience. Has led NBS project development, due diligence and corporate nature strategy across REDD+, ARR, IFM and agroforestry programmes — and runs Climate Decode’s Canopy procurement product end-to-end.

Track record 79+ projects · 25 countries · voluntary, compliance & nature markets
Juan Manuel Cardona-Granda

Juan Manuel Cardona-Granda

Silviculture, Wildlife & Modelling · Fundación HAMBOS

Silviculture, wildlife management and quantitative modelling for forestry projects — the technical engine behind HAMBOS’ project design, monitoring and biodiversity work across the Andean region.

Strategic Partner Fundación HAMBOS — Climate Decode’s partner for Nature, Land & Forestry · Bogotá, Colombia

Connect your FLAG target to your nature story.

If your business sources palm, soy, cocoa, beef, paper or any FLAG-relevant commodity in volume, you almost certainly trip the threshold. We’ll do the eligibility check, model the pathway, and submit the target — integrated with the TNFD disclosure that uses the same data.